Ewch i’r prif gynnwys

Dr Stephanie Rennick & Dr Charlotte Newey

Lecturers,School of English, Communication and Philosophy

Cyhoeddwyd 07 Sep 2017 • 30 munud o ddarllen

icon8 Cydnabyddiaeth Download Lawrlwytho

Improving Peer Review: A Pilot Study

This is a downloadable report on the outcomes of a project investigating the role of peer-assessment and feedback.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION & METHODOLOGY

There is an apparent tension between the indicative workload limit for assessment and feedback (one hour per student, per module) and the diversity and quality of feedback the University aims to give. A common suggestion is to make use of peer feedback. Anecdotal evidence suggests peer feedback is positively received in some disciplines, yet underutilised or unpopular in others. This pilot study starts to explore the conditions under which peer feedback works (or doesn’t), identifies some of the particular factors and circumstances affecting its reception by students, and suggests ways to remove barriers to its successful implementation. The project focussed mostly on Philosophy, but we anticipate the findings will have wider application.

The project’s overarching aims were three-fold:

1. To trial different opportunities for, and kinds of, peer feedback.

2. To gather qualitative and quantitative data on the perceived usefulness of peer feedback, before, during, and after interventions (see below).

3. To improve students’ ability to identify and utilise different kinds of feedback (including, but not limited to, peer feedback).

Ultimately, we wished to improve the perception of peer feedback among students by helping them to understand its usefulness, identify the conditions under which it is most valuable, and gain insight into the barriers that can hinder its success.

To achieve these outcomes, we set three specific objectives:

  1. a. Canvas opinion among undergraduates concerning peer feedback (gathering both qualitative and quantitative data) – see §1.1.
  2. b. Trial six interventions across three modules in philosophy (two undergraduate and one postgraduate module) – see §1.2.
  3. c. Measure the difference in perceived usefulness between the different interventions, including instances identified explicitly as constituting peer feedback versus those described merely in terms of the activity (e.g. ‘a group exercise’) – see §2f.

Please download to see the full report

Download Lawrlwytho

Hefyd o ddiddordeb:

Reflecting on reflections

Dr Kate Gilliver

Cyhoeddwyd 21 Jul 2021 • 15 munud o ddarllen

This presentation from the 2021 Learning & Teaching Conference talks about what reflective writing as an assessment has revealed about the student experience of active learning in a pandemic.


Pynciau

Ways of learning | Designing for distance learners | Engaging with student feedback | Assessment design | Providing feedback | Supporting Placement Learning |

icon0 cydnabyddiaeth

Myfyrio ar fyfyrdodau

Dr Kate Gilliver

Cyhoeddwyd 21 Jul 2021 • 15 munud o ddarllen

Mae'r cyflwyniad hwn o Gynhadledd Dysgu ac Addysgu 2021 yn trafod yr hyn y mae ysgrifennu myfyriol fel asesiad wedi’i ddatgelu am brofiad myfyrwyr o ddysgu gweithredol mewn pandemig.


Pynciau

Ways of learning | Designing for distance learners | Engaging with student feedback | Assessment design | Providing feedback | Supporting Placement Learning |

icon0 cydnabyddiaeth

Student Peer Assessment - Video Case Study

Dr Josh Robinson

Cyhoeddwyd 17 Feb 2017 • 12 munudutes o ddarllen

Video case study from Dr Josh Robinson from the School of English, Communication & Philosophy about the introduction of peer assessment in one of his modules


Pynciau

Assessment design

icon3 cydnabyddiaeth

Student Peer Assessment - Video Case Study

Dr Josh Robinson

Cyhoeddwyd 17 Feb 2017 • 12 munudutes o ddarllen

Video case study from Dr Josh Robinson from the School of English, Communication & Philosophy about the introduction of peer assessment in one of his modules


Pynciau

Assessment design

icon3 cydnabyddiaeth

The opportunities of Panopto within the School of Music

Dr Daniel Bickerton

Cyhoeddwyd 17 Oct 2019 • 19 munud o ddarllen

Dr Daniel Bickerton of the School of Music describes how he used Panopto within the School of Music to enable students to evaluate their performances following assessments and receive feedback


Pynciau

Assessment design | Managing assessments | Providing feedback |

icon0 cydnabyddiaeth

Peer review of exemplar work

Dr Andrew Roberts

Cyhoeddwyd 21 Jul 2021 • 15 munud o ddarllen

This presentation from the 2021 Learning & Teaching Conference talks about how peer review of exemplar work allows students to compare their work to that of others and helps them to engage with the assessment criteria. Exemplar review was used as


Pynciau

Ways of learning | Learning journeys | Designing for distance learners | Engaging with student feedback | Assessment design | Managing assessments | Providing feedback |

icon0 cydnabyddiaeth

Cyfrannu at yr Hwb Dysgu

Mae'r Hwb Dysgu wedi ei greu gan academyddion i academyddion, ac rydym yn eich annog chi i rannu unrhyw beth sydd yn cefnogi, amlygu neu adlewyrchu ar dysgu ac addysgu yma ym Mhrifysgol Caerdydd.

Mae hwn yn gyfle i gymryd rhan weithredol o'r gymuned ddysgu yng Nghaerdydd, i rannu eich arbenigedd gyda'ch cyd-weithwyr.