Formal argumentation theory

Cyhoeddiadau

• Hunter, A. , Polberg, S. and Thimm, M. 2020. Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments. Artificial Intelligence 281 103236. (10.1016/j.artint.2020.103236)
• Hunter, A. , Polberg, S. and Potyka, N. 2019. Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 113 , pp.207-244. (10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006)
• Caminada, M. and Dunne, P. 2019. Strong admissibility revisited: theory and applications. Argument and Computation 10 (3), pp.277-300. (10.3233/AAC-190463)
• Potyka, N. , Polberg, S. and Hunter, A. 2019. Polynomial-time updates of epistemic states in a fragment of probabilistic epistemic argumentation. Presented at: 15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019) Belgrade, Serbia September 18-20, 2019. , pp.-.
• Hunter, A. , Polberg, S. and Potyka, N. 2018. Updating belief in arguments in epistemic graphs. Presented at: 16th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Tempe, AZ, USA 30 October - 2 November 2018. Sixteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. , pp.138-147.
• Hunter, A. and Polberg, S. 2018. Empirical methods for modelling persuadees in dialogical argumentation. Presented at: 2017 IEEE 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) Boston, MA, USA 6-8 November 2017. 2017 IEEE 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). IEEE. , pp.382-389. (10.1109/ICTAI.2017.00066)
• Caminada, M. and Schulz, C. 2018. On the equivalence between assumption-based argumentation and logic programming (extended abstract). Presented at: IJCAI-ECAI-18 Stockholm 13-19 July 2018.
• Hadoux, E. , Hunter, A. and Polberg, S. 2018. Biparty decision theory for dialogical argumentation. Presented at: 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument Warsaw, Poland 12th-14 September 2018. Published in: Modgil, S. and Budzynska, K. eds. Computational Models of Argument. Vol. 305.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications IOS. , pp.233-240. (10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-233)
• Thimm, M. , Polberg, S. and Hunter, A. 2018. Epistemic attack semantics. Presented at: 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument Warsaw, Poland 12th-14 September. Published in: Modgil, S. , Budzynska, K. and Lawrence, J. eds. Computational Models of Argument. Vol. 305.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications IOS. , pp.37-48. (10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-37)
• Awad, E. et al., 2017. Pareto optimality and strategy-proofness in group argument evaluation. Journal of Logic and Computation 27 (8), pp.2581-2609. (10.1093/logcom/exx017)
• Awad, E. et al., 2017. Experimental assessment of aggregation principles in argumentation-enabled collective intelligence. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 17 (3) 29. (10.1145/3053371)
• Awad, E. et al., 2017. Judgement aggregation in multi-agent argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 27 (1), pp.227-259. (10.1093/logcom/exv055)
• Caminada, M. 2017. Argumentation semantics as formal discussion. In: Gabbay, D. et al., Handbook of Formal Argumentation, Volume 1. College Publications
• Caminada, M. 2017. Rationality postulates: applying argumentation theory for non-monotonic reasoning. In: Gabbay, D. et al., Handbook of Formal Argumentation, Volume 1. College Publications
• Caminada, M. and Booth, R. 2016. A dialectical approach for argument-based judgment aggregation. Presented at: 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2016) Potsdam, Germany 13-16 September 2016. Published in: Baroni, P. et al., Computational Models of Argument. Vol. 287.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications IOS Press. , pp.179-190. (10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-179)
• Caminada, M. et al. 2015. On the difference between assumption-based argumentation and abstract argumentation. IfCoLog Journal of Logic and its Applications 2 (1), pp.15-34.
• Sakama, C. , Caminada, M. and Herzig, A. 2015. A formal account of dishonesty. Logic Journal of the IGPL 23 (2), pp.259-294. (10.1093/jigpal/jzu043)
• Caminada, M. et al. 2015. On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 58 , pp.87-111. (10.1016/j.ijar.2014.12.004)
• Booth, R. 2015. Judgment aggregation in abstract dialectical frameworks. In: Thomas, E. et al., Advance in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming and Abstract Argumentation. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Springer. , pp.296-308. (10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0)
• Caminada, M. 2015. A discussion game for grounded semantics. Presented at: 3rd International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation Buenos Aires, Argentina 25-26 July 2015. Published in: Black, E. , Modgil, S. and Oren, N. eds. Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation: Third International Workshop, TAFA 2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 25-26, 2015, Revised Selected Papers. Vol. 9524.Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer. , pp.59-73. (10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_4)
• Caminada, M. 2014. Strong admissibility revisited. In: Parsons, S. et al., Computational Models of Argument. Vol. 266, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications IOS Press. , pp.197-208. (10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-197)