Skip to main content

Dr Stephanie Rennick & Dr Charlotte Newey

Lecturers,School of English, Communication and Philosophy

Published 07 Sep 2017 • 30 mins read

icon0 Recognitions Download Download

Improving Peer Review: A Pilot Study

This is a downloadable report on the outcomes of a project investigating the role of peer-assessment and feedback.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION & METHODOLOGY

There is an apparent tension between the indicative workload limit for assessment and feedback (one hour per student, per module) and the diversity and quality of feedback the University aims to give. A common suggestion is to make use of peer feedback. Anecdotal evidence suggests peer feedback is positively received in some disciplines, yet underutilised or unpopular in others. This pilot study starts to explore the conditions under which peer feedback works (or doesn’t), identifies some of the particular factors and circumstances affecting its reception by students, and suggests ways to remove barriers to its successful implementation. The project focussed mostly on Philosophy, but we anticipate the findings will have wider application.

The project’s overarching aims were three-fold:

1. To trial different opportunities for, and kinds of, peer feedback.

2. To gather qualitative and quantitative data on the perceived usefulness of peer feedback, before, during, and after interventions (see below).

3. To improve students’ ability to identify and utilise different kinds of feedback (including, but not limited to, peer feedback).

Ultimately, we wished to improve the perception of peer feedback among students by helping them to understand its usefulness, identify the conditions under which it is most valuable, and gain insight into the barriers that can hinder its success.

To achieve these outcomes, we set three specific objectives:

  1. a. Canvas opinion among undergraduates concerning peer feedback (gathering both qualitative and quantitative data) – see §1.1.
  2. b. Trial six interventions across three modules in philosophy (two undergraduate and one postgraduate module) – see §1.2.
  3. c. Measure the difference in perceived usefulness between the different interventions, including instances identified explicitly as constituting peer feedback versus those described merely in terms of the activity (e.g. ‘a group exercise’) – see §2f.

Please download to see the full report

Download Download

You might also be interested in:

Reflecting on reflections

Dr Kate Gilliver

Published 21 Jul 2021 15 mins read

This presentation from the 2021 Learning & Teaching Conference talks about what reflective writing as an assessment has revealed about the student experience of active learning in a pandemic.


Topics

Ways of learning | Designing for distance learners | Engaging with student feedback | Assessment design | Providing feedback | Supporting Placement Learning |

icon0 recommendations

Myfyrio ar fyfyrdodau

Dr Kate Gilliver

Published 21 Jul 2021 15 mins read

Mae'r cyflwyniad hwn o Gynhadledd Dysgu ac Addysgu 2021 yn trafod yr hyn y mae ysgrifennu myfyriol fel asesiad wedi’i ddatgelu am brofiad myfyrwyr o ddysgu gweithredol mewn pandemig.


Topics

Ways of learning | Designing for distance learners | Engaging with student feedback | Assessment design | Providing feedback | Supporting Placement Learning |

icon0 recommendations

Student Peer Assessment - Video Case Study

Dr Josh Robinson

Published 17 Feb 2017 12 minutes read

Video case study from Dr Josh Robinson from the School of English, Communication & Philosophy about the introduction of peer assessment in one of his modules


Topics

Assessment design

icon3 recommendations

Student Peer Assessment - Video Case Study

Dr Josh Robinson

Published 17 Feb 2017 12 minutes read

Video case study from Dr Josh Robinson from the School of English, Communication & Philosophy about the introduction of peer assessment in one of his modules


Topics

Assessment design

icon3 recommendations

Peer review of exemplar work

Dr Andrew Roberts

Published 21 Jul 2021 15 mins read

This presentation from the 2021 Learning & Teaching Conference talks about how peer review of exemplar work allows students to compare their work to that of others and helps them to engage with the assessment criteria. Exemplar review was used as


Topics

Ways of learning | Learning journeys | Designing for distance learners | Engaging with student feedback | Assessment design | Managing assessments | Providing feedback |

icon0 recommendations

The opportunities of Panopto within the School of Music

Dr Daniel Bickerton

Published 17 Oct 2019 19 mins read

Dr Daniel Bickerton of the School of Music describes how he used Panopto within the School of Music to enable students to evaluate their performances following assessments and receive feedback


Topics

Assessment design | Managing assessments | Providing feedback |

icon0 recommendations

Contribute to the Learning Hub

The Learning Hub is designed by academics for academics and we would encourage you to share anything that supports, enhances or prompts reflection on teaching and learning here at Cardiff University.

This is an opportunity to be an active part of the teaching community here at Cardiff, to share your expertise with your colleagues.