Yr Athro Nick Pidgeon

2022

• Cherry, C.et al. 2022. A personas-based approach to deliberating local decarbonisation scenarios: findings and methodological insights. Energy Research and Social Science 87, article number: 102455. (10.1016/j.erss.2021.102455)

2021

• Michie, S.et al. 2021. Staying 'Covid safe': Proposals for embedding behaviours that protect against Covid-19 transmission in the UK. British Journal of Health Psychology 26(4), pp. 1238-1257. (10.1111/bjhp.12557)
• Roberts, E.et al. 2021. Valuing nature for wellbeing: narratives of socio-ecological change in dynamic intertidal landscapes. Environmental Values 30(4), pp. 501-523. (10.3197/096327120X15916910310635)
• Groves, C.et al. 2021. The future is flexible? Exploring expert visions of energy system decarbonisation. Futures 130, article number: 102753. (10.1016/j.futures.2021.102753)
• Spence, E., Cox, E. and Pidgeon, N. 2021. Exploring cross-national public support for the use of enhanced weathering as a land-based carbon dioxide removal strategy. Climatic Change 165, article number: 23. (10.1007/s10584-021-03050-y)
• Cox, E., Pidgeon, N. and Spence, E. 2021. But they told us it was safe! Carbon dioxide removal, fracking, and ripple effects in risk perceptions. Risk Analysis (10.1111/risa.13717)
• Shirani, F.et al. 2021. ‘Who cares about valley people?’ – lived experiences of energy vulnerability in the South Wales valleys. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 29(1), pp. 103-120. (10.1332/175982720X16074511160827)
• Thomas, M.et al. 2021. Using photographs in coastal research and engagement: reflections on two case studies. In: Gustavsson, M. et al. eds. Researching People and the Sea: Methodologies and Traditions. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 181-208.
• Pidgeon, N. 2021. Engaging publics about environmental and technology risks: frames, values and deliberation. Journal of Risk Research 24(1), pp. 28-46. (10.1080/13669877.2020.1749118)
• Groves, C.et al. 2021. A missing link? Capabilities, the ethics of care, and the relational context of energy justice. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 22(2), pp. 249-269. (10.1080/19452829.2021.1887105)
• Shirani, F.et al. 2021. Mine water heating in Caerau: Thoughts from local residents. 2020 Report. Project Report. FLEXIS.

2020

• Groves, C.et al. 2020. ‘The bills are a brick wall’: narratives of energy vulnerability, poverty and adaptation in South Wales. Energy Research and Social Science 70, article number: 101777. (10.1016/j.erss.2020.101777)
• Shirani, F.et al. 2020. 'I'm the smart meter': Perceptions and experiences of smart technology amongst vulnerable consumers.. Energy Policy 144, article number: 111637. (10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111637)
• Thomas, G., Demski, C. and Pidgeon, N. 2020. Energy justice discourses in citizen deliberations on systems flexibility in the United Kingdom: Vulnerability, compensation and empowerment. Energy Research and Social Science 66, article number: 101494. (10.1016/j.erss.2020.101494)
• Cox, E., Spence, E. and Pidgeon, N. 2020. Public perceptions of carbon dioxide removal in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nature Climate Change 10, pp. 744-749. (10.1038/s41558-020-0823-z)
• Beerling, D. J.et al. 2020. Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands. Nature 583, pp. 242-248. (10.1038/s41586-020-2448-9)
• Shirani, F.et al. 2020. What counts as success? Wider implications of achieving planning permission in a low-impact ecovillage. Environmental Values 29(3), pp. 339-359. (10.3197/096327119X15579936382536)
• Cox, E., Spence, E. and Pidgeon, N. 2020. Incumbency, trust and the Monsanto effect: stakeholder discourses on greenhouse gas removal. Environmental Values 29(2), pp. 197-220. (10.3197/096327119X15678473650947)
• Steentjes, K.et al. 2020. British public perceptions of climate risk, adaptation options and resilience (RESiL RISK): Topline findings of a GB survey conducted in October 2019. Project Report. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

2019

• Thomas, G., Demski, C. and Pidgeon, N. 2019. Deliberating the social acceptability of energy storage in the UK. Energy Policy 133, article number: 110908. (10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110908)
• Bertoldo, R.et al. 2019. Scientific truth or debate: On the link between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science 28(7), pp. 778-796. (10.1177/0963662519865448)
• Becker, S.et al. 2019. Of profits, transparency, and responsibility: public views on financing energy system change in Great Britain. Energy Research and Social Science 55, pp. 236-246. (10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.013)
• Pidgeon, N. 2019. Observing the English weather – a personal journey from safety I to IV,. In: Le Coze, J. ed. Safety Science Research: Evolution, Challenges and New Directions. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
• Osman, M.et al. 2019. Evidence based uncertainty: what is needed now?. Journal of Risk Research 24(5), pp. 622-628. (10.1080/13669877.2019.1646316)
• Harthorn, B. H.et al. 2019. Health risk perception and shale development in the UK and US. Health, Risk and Society 21(2), pp. 35-56. (10.1080/13698575.2019.1601685)
• Demski, C.et al. 2019. Acceptance of energy transitions and policies: Public conceptualisations of energy as a need and basic right in the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 48, pp. 33-45. (10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.018)
• Doran, R.et al. 2019. Consequence evaluations and moral concerns about climate change: insights from nationally representative surveys across four European countries. Journal of Risk Research 22(5), pp. 610-626. (10.1080/13669877.2018.1473468)
• Groves, C.et al. 2019. Better energy futures: Developing a framework for addressing fuel poverty poverty. Project Report. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

2018

• Thomas, G., Pidgeon, N. and Roberts, E. 2018. Ambivalence, naturalness and normality in public perceptions of carbon capture and storage in biomass, fossil energy, and industrial applications in the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 46, pp. 1-9. (10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.007)
• Cherry, C.et al. 2018. Public acceptance of resource-efficiency strategies to mitigate climate change. Nature Climate Change 8, pp. 1007-1012. (10.1038/s41558-018-0298-3)
• Peake, L.et al. 2018. By popular demand: what people want from a resource efficient economy. London: Green Alliance. Available at: https://www.green-alliance.org.uk/by_popular_demand.php
• Spence, E., Pidgeon, N. and Pearson, P. 2018. UK public perceptions of ocean acidification - the importance of place and environmental identity. Marine Policy 97, pp. 287-293. (10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.006)
• Thomas, M.et al. 2018. Using role play to explore energy perceptions in the United States and United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 45, pp. 363-373. (10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.026)
• Thomas, M., Pidgeon, N. and Bradshaw, M. 2018. Shale development in the US and Canada: a review of engagement practice. The Extractive Industries and Society 5(4), pp. 557-569. (10.1016/j.exis.2018.07.011)
• Brügger, A. and Pidgeon, N. 2018. Spatial framing, existing associations, and climate change. Environmental Values 27(5), pp. 559-584. (10.3197/096327118X15321668325966)
• Cherry, C. and Pidgeon, N. 2018. Is sharing the solution? Exploring public acceptability of the sharing economy. Journal of Cleaner Production 195, pp. 939-948. (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.278)
• Partridge, T.et al. 2018. Urgency in energy justice: Contestation and time in prospective shale extraction in the United States and United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 42, pp. 138-146. (10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.018)
• Evensen, D.et al. 2018. The relationship between justice and acceptance of energy transition costs in the UK. Applied Energy 222, pp. 451-459. (10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.165)
• Cherry, C. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2018. Why is ownership an issue? Exploring factors that determine public acceptance of product-service systems. Sustainability 10(7), article number: 2289. (10.3390/su10072289)
• Cox, E.et al. 2018. Blurred lines: the ethics and policy of Greenhouse Gas Removal at scale. Frontiers in Environmental Science 6, article number: 38. (10.3389/fenvs.2018.00038)
• Barrett, J.et al. 2018. Industrial energy, materials and products: UK decarbonisation challenges and opportunities. Applied Thermal Engineering 136, pp. 643-656. (10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.049)
• MacGillivray, B. H. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2018. Risk and rationality: the “frame problem” revisited, from the laboratory to the public sphere. In: Marsden, T. K. ed. The SAGE Handbook of Nature. SAGE
• Shirani, F.et al. 2018. UK smart living demonstrator (better energy futures) – research report. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

2017

• Thomas, G.et al. 2017. Texturing waste: attachment and identity in every-day consumption and waste practices. Environmental Values 26(6), pp. 733-755., article number: 23. (10.3197/096327117X15046905490362)
• Demski, C.et al. 2017. Public prioritisation of energy affordability in the UK. Energy Policy 110, pp. 404-409. (10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.044)
• Shirani, F.et al. 2017. Critical moments? Life transitions and energy biographies. Geoforum 86, pp. 86-92. (10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.006)
• Groves, C.et al. 2017. Why mundane energy use matters: Energy biographies, attachment and identity. Energy Research and Social Science 30, pp. 71-81. (10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.016)
• Pidgeon, N.et al. 2017. Hydraulic fracturing: a risk for environment, energy security and affordability?. In: Kasperson, R. ed. Risk Conundrums: Solving Unsolvable Problems. Routledge, pp. 177-188.
• Thomas, M.et al. 2017. Public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas and oil in the United States and Canada. WIRES Climate Change 8(3), pp. e450. (10.1002/wcc.450)
• Thomas, M.et al. 2017. Deliberating the perceived risks, benefits and societal implications of shale gas and oil extraction by hydraulic fracturing in the US and UK. Nature Energy 2, article number: 17054. (10.1038/nenergy.2017.54)
• Pidgeon, N. and Spence, E. 2017. Perceptions of enhanced weathering as a biological negative emissions option. Biology Letters 13(4), article number: 20170024. (10.1098/rsbl.2017.0024)
• Demski, C., Pidgeon, N. and Spence, A. 2017. Effects of exemplar scenarios on public preferences for energy futures using the my2050 scenario-building tool. Nature Energy 2(4), article number: 17027. (10.1038/nenergy.2017.27)
• Demski, C.et al. 2017. Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Climatic Change 140(2), pp. 149-164. (10.1007/s10584-016-1837-4)
• Cherry, C.et al. 2017. Homes as machines: Exploring expert and public imaginaries of low carbon housing futures in the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 23, pp. 36-45. (10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.011)
• Partridge, T.et al. 2017. Seeing futures now: Emergent US and UK views on shale development, climate change and energy systems. Global Environmental Change 42, pp. 1-12. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.002)
• Steentjes, K.et al. 2017. European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Project Report. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
• Corner, A. J.et al. 2017. European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): six recommendations for public engagement. Project Report. Oxford: Climate Outreach.

2016

• McLaren, D.et al. 2016. Public conceptions of justice in climate engineering: Evidence from secondary analysis of public deliberation. Global Environmental Change 41, pp. 64-73. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.09.002)
• Capstick, S. B.et al. 2016. Public understanding in Great Britain of ocean acidification. Nature Climate Change 6, pp. 763-767. (10.1038/nclimate3005)
• Shirani, F.et al. 2016. Living in the future: environmental concerns, parenting, and low-impact lifestyles. In: Ansell, N., Klocker, N. and Skelton, T. eds. Geographies of Global Issues: Change and Threat., Vol. 8. Geographies of Children and Young People Singapore: Springer, pp. 1-20., (10.1007/978-981-4585-95-8_4-1)
• Shirani, F.et al. 2016. Asking about the future: methodological insights from energy biographies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 19(4), pp. 429-444. (10.1080/13645579.2015.1029208)
• Groves, C.et al. 2016. Invested in unsustainability? On the psychosocial patterning of engagement in practices. Environmental Values 25(3), pp. 309-328. (10.3197/096327116X14598445991466)
• Groves, C.et al. 2016. Energy biographies: narrative genres, lifecourse transitions and practice change. Science, Technology, and Human Values 41(3), pp. 483-508. (10.1177/0162243915609116)
• Groves, C.et al. 2016. The grit in the oyster: using energy biographies to question socio-technical imaginaries of 'smartness'. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3(1), pp. 4-25. (10.1080/23299460.2016.1178897)
• Henwood, K.et al. 2016. Energy Biographies Research Report. Project Report. Cardiff: .Energy Biographies.
• Thomas, M. J.et al. 2016. Public perceptions of shale gas operations in the USA and Canada: a review of evidence. Project Report. [Online]. M4ShaleGas Consortium. Available at: http://m4shalegas.eu/reportsp4.html
• Arnold, A.et al. 2016. Socio-political profiles to inform a cross-national survey in France, Germany, Norway and the UK.. Project Report. [Online]. Oxford: Climate Outreach. Available at: http://climateoutreach.org/resources/european-perceptions

2015

• Butler, C.et al. 2015. Public values for energy futures: Framing, indeterminacy and policy making. Energy Policy 87, pp. 665-672. (10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.035)
• Capstick, S. B., Pidgeon, N. F. and Henwood, K. 2015. Stability and change in British public discourses about climate change between 1997 and 2010. Environmental Values 24(6), pp. 725-753. (10.3197/096327115X14420732702617)
• Capstick, S. B., Corner, A. J. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2015. Climate change communication. In: Luber, G. and Lemery, J. eds. Global Climate Change and Human Health: From Science to Practice. Jossey-Bass, pp. 467-502.
• Parkhill, K.et al. 2015. "We are a community but that takes a certain amount of energy": Exploring shared visions, social action and resilience in place-based community-led initiatives. Environmental Science & Policy 53(A), pp. 60-69. (10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.014)
• Brügger, A.et al. 2015. Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nature Climate Change 5(12), pp. 1031-1037. (10.1038/nclimate2760)
• Demski, C.et al. 2015. Public values for energy system change. Global Environmental Change 34, pp. 59-69. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.014)
• Henwood, K. and Pidgeon, N. 2015. Gender, ethical voices and UK energy policy in the post-Fukushima Era. In: Tahbi, B. and Roeser, S. eds. The Ethics of Nuclear Energy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67-84.
• Thomas, M.et al. 2015. Mental models of sea-level change: A mixed methods analysis on the Severn Estuary, UK. Global Environmental Change 33, pp. 71-82. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.009)
• Spence, A.et al. 2015. Public perceptions of demand-side management and a smarter energy future. Nature Climate Change 5, pp. 550-554. (10.1038/nclimate2610)
• Corner, A. J. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2015. Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change 130(3), pp. 425-438. (10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6)
• Thomas, M.et al. 2015. Expert judgements of sea-level rise at the local scale. Journal of Risk Research 19(5), pp. 664-685. (10.1080/13669877.2015.1043568)
• Cherry, C.et al. 2015. Media discourses of low carbon housing: The marginalisation of social and behavioural dimensions within the British broadsheet press. Public Understanding of Science 24(3), pp. 302-310. (10.1177/0963662513512442)
• Capstick, S. B.et al. 2015. Public perception of climate change in Britain following the winter 2013/2014 flooding. Project Report. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
• Butler, C.et al. 2015. Public engagement with energy system change. Energia, Ambiente E Innovazione: Speciale - Transition and global challenges towards low carbon societies, pp. 71-74. (10.12910/EAI2015-017)
• Shirani, F.et al. 2015. I’m not a tree hugger, I’m just like you’: changing perceptions of sustainable lifestyles. Environmental Politics 24(1), pp. 57-74. (10.1080/09644016.2014.959247)

2014

• Capstick, S. B.et al. 2014. International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 6(1), pp. 35-61. (10.1002/wcc.321)
• Butler, C., Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. Energy consumption and everyday life: choice, values and agency through a practice theoretical lens. Journal of Consumer Culture 16(3), pp. 887-907. (10.1177/1469540514553691)
• Pidgeon, N. F.et al. 2014. Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(Suppl), pp. 13606-13613. (10.1073/pnas.1317512111)
• Butler, C.et al. 2014. Examining the dynamics of energy demand through a biographical lens. Nature and Culture 9(2), pp. 164-182. (10.3167/nc.2014.090204)
• Corner, A. J., Markowitz, E. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 5(3), pp. 411-422. (10.1002/wcc.269)
• Demski, C. C., Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. Exploring public perceptions of energy security risks in the UK. Energy Policy 66, pp. 369-378. (10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.079)
• Capstick, S. B. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change. Climatic Change 122(4), pp. 695-708. (10.1007/s10584-013-1003-1)
• Capstick, S. B. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change 24, pp. 389-401. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.012)
• Parkhill, K., Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. Landscapes of threat: exploring discourses of stigma around large energy developments. Landscape Research 39(5), pp. 566-582. (10.1080/01426397.2013.775232)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. Complexity, uncertainty and future risks. Journal of Risk Research 17(10), pp. 1269-1271. (10.1080/13669877.2014.940599)
• Corner, A. J., Capstick, S. B. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. Public perceptions of ocean acidification summary findings of two nationally representative surveys of the British public, October 2014. Working paper. Cardiff University.

2013

• Rayner, S.et al. 2013. The Oxford principles. Climatic Change 121(3), pp. 499-512. (10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2)
• Parkhill, K.et al. 2013. Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability - Synthesis Report. Project Report. [Online]. London: UKERC. Available at: http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=3229
• Butler, C., Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2013. Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability - Deliberating energy system transitions in the UK. Project Report. [Online]. London: UKERC. Available at: http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=3083
• Pidgeon, N. F.et al. 2013. Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project. Nature Climate Change 3, pp. 451-457. (10.1038/NCLIMATE1807)
• Demski, C., Spence, A. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2013. Transforming the UK energy system: public values, attitudes and acceptability - summary findings from a survey conducted August 2012. Project Report. London: UKERC.
• Butler, C., Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2013. Nuclear power after 3/11: Looking back and thinking ahead. In: Hindmarsh, R. ed. Nuclear Disaster at Fukushima Daiichi: Social, Political and Environmental Issues. Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society London: Routledge
• Shirani, F. J.et al. 2013. Disconnected futures: exploring notions of ethical responsibility in energy practices. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 18(4), pp. 455-468. (10.1080/13549839.2013.779236)
• Capstick, S. B., Pidgeon, N. and Whitehead, M. 2013. Public perceptions of climate change in Wales: Summary findings of a survey of the Welsh public conducted during November and December 2012. Project Report. [Online]. Climate Change Consortium of Wales. Available at: http://c3wales.org/thematic_clusters/survey-findings-reveal-public-perceptions-of-climate-change/
• Corner, A. J.et al. 2013. Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change 23(5), pp. 938-947. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002)
• Poortinga, W., Aoyagi, M. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2013. Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures before and after the Fukushima accident: A comparison between Britain and Japan. Energy Policy 62, pp. 1204-1211. (10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.015)
• Satterfield, T.et al. 2013. Understanding shifting perceptions of nanotechnologies and their implications for policy dialogues about emerging technologies. Science and Public Policy 40(2), pp. 247-260. (10.1093/scipol/scs084)
• Parkhill, K.et al. 2013. Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. In: Owen, R., Bessant, J. and Heintz, M. eds. Responsible Innovation:Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Wiley, pp. 219-240.

2012

• Venables, D.et al. 2012. Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32(4), pp. 371-383. (10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.003)
• Corner, A. J., Pidgeon, N. F. and Parkhill, K. 2012. Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives & the challenge of 'upstream' engagement. WIRES Climage Change 3(5), pp. 451-466. (10.1002/wcc.176)
• Pidgeon, N. F.et al. 2012. Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 370(1974), pp. 4176-4196. (10.1098/rsta.2012.0099)
• Poortinga, W.et al. 2012. Individual-motivational factors in the acceptability of demand-side and supply-side measures to reduce carbon emissions. Energy Policy 48, pp. 812-819. (10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.029)
• Corner, A. J. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2012. Nanotechnologies and upstream public engagement: dilemmas, debates and prospects?. In: Herr Harthorn, B. and Mohr, J. W. eds. The Social Life of Nanotechnology., Vol. 18. Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge
• Pidgeon, N. F. and Demski, C. 2012. From nuclear to renewable: Energy system transformation and public attitudes. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68(4), pp. 41-51. (10.1177/0096340212451592)
• Spence, A., Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2012. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis 32(6), pp. 957-972. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x)
• Butler, C., Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2012. Briefing note: transforming the UK energy system public values, attitudes and acceptability, interim findings, May 2012. Working paper. Cardiff: School of Psychology, Cardiff University. Available at: http://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/Briefing%20Note%20I%20Transforming%20the%20UK%20Energy%20System.pdf
• Pidgeon, N. F. 2012. Climate Change Risk Perception and Communication: Addressing a Critical Moment?. Risk Analysis 32(6), pp. 951-956. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01856.x)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 2012. Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy 12(S1), pp. S85-S106. (10.1080/14693062.2012.702982)
• Randle, S.et al. 2012. A trans-atlantic conversation on responsible innovation and responsible governance. In: van Lenet, H. et al. eds. Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. IOS Press, pp. 169-180.

2011

• Poortinga, W.et al. 2011. Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change 21(3), pp. 1015-1024. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001)
• Parkhill, K.et al. 2011. Laughing it off? Humour, affect and emotion work in communities living with nuclear risk. British Journal of Sociology 62(2), pp. 324-346. (10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01367.x)
• Spence, A.et al. 2011. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change 1(1), pp. 46-49. (10.1038/nclimate1059)
• Pidgeon, N. F. and Fischhoff, B. 2011. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change 1, pp. 35-41. (10.1038/nclimate1080)
• Corner, A., Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. 2011. 'Experiment Earth?' Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Working paper. Cardiff: School of Psychology, Cardiff University. Available at: http://www.iagp.ac.uk/publications/‘experiment-earth’-reflections-public-dialogue-geoengineering
• Butler, C., Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2011. Nuclear Power After Japan: The Social Dimensions. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 53(6), pp. 3-14. (10.1080/00139157.2011.623051)
• Corner, A. J.et al. 2011. Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy 39(9), pp. 4823-4833. (10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.037)
• Butler, C., Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2011. From the material to the imagined: public engagement with low carbon technologies in a nuclear community. In: Devine-Wright, P. ed. Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation. London: Earthscan, pp. 301-316.
• Pidgeon, N. F., Harthorn, B. and Satterfield, T. 2011. Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis 31(11), pp. 1694-1700. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x)
• Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2011. From ‘flood defence’ to ‘flood risk management’: exploring governance, responsibility, and blame. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29(3), pp. 533-547. (10.1068/c09181j)
• Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2011. Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops. Working paper. Cardiff: School of Psychology, Cardiff University. Available at: http://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/spice.pdf

2010

• Spence, A. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2010. Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change 20(4), pp. 656-667. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002)
• Spence, A. A.et al. 2010. Public perceptions of energy choices: the influence of beliefs about climate change and the environment. Energy and Environment 21(5), pp. 385-407. (10.1260/0958-305X.21.5.385)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 2010. Public understanding of and attitudes towards climate change. Discussion Paper. London: Government Office for Science. Available at: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/international-dimensions/11-1021-public-understanding-of-climate-change
• Parkhill, K.et al. 2010. From the familiar to the extraordinary: local residents’ perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35(1), pp. 39-58. (10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00364.x)
• Hall, J. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2010. A systems view of climate change. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 27(3), pp. 243-253. (10.1080/10286608.2010.482659)
• Pidgeon, N. F. and Corner, A. J. 2010. Geoengineering the climate – the social and ethical implications. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 52(1), pp. 24-37. (10.1080/00139150903479563)
• Corner, A. J.et al. 2010. Communicating climate change to mass public audiences. Working paper. Climate Outreach and Information Network.
• Henwood, K. L.et al. 2010. Researching risk: Narrative, biography, subjectivity. FQS: Forum Qualitative Social Research - Sozialforschung 11(1), article number: 20.
• Bickerstaff, K.et al. 2010. Locating Scientific Citizenship: The Institutional Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(4), pp. 474-500. (10.1177/0162243909345835)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 2010. Systems thinking, culture of reliability and safety. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 27(3), pp. 211-217. (10.1080/10286608.2010.482660)

2009

• Pidgeon, N. F.et al. 2009. Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology 4(2), pp. 95-98. (10.1038/nnano.2008.362)
• Venables, D.et al. 2009. Living with nuclear power: a Q-Method study of local community perceptions. Risk Analysis 29(8), pp. 1089-1104. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01259.x)
• Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2009. Media communications and public understanding of climate change: reporting scientific consensus on anthropogenic warming. In: Boyce, T. and Lewis, J. eds. Climate Change and the Media. Global Crises and the Media Vol. 5. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 43-58.
• de França Doria, M., Pidgeon, N. F. and Hunter, P. R. 2009. Perceptions of drinking water quality and risk and its effect on behaviour: A cross-national study. Science of the Total Environment 407(21), pp. 5455-5464. (10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.031)
• Pidgeon, N. F. and Butler, C. 2009. Risk analysis and climate change. Environmental Politics 18(5), pp. 670-688. (10.1080/09644010903156976)
• Spence, A. A. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2009. Psychology, Climate Change & Sustainable Bahaviour. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51(6), pp. 8-18. (10.1080/00139150903337217)

2008

• Rowe, G.et al. 2008. Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations. Public Understanding of Science 17(4), pp. 419-441. (10.1177/0963662506075351)
• Bickerstaff, K.et al. 2008. Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science 17(2), pp. 145-169. (10.1177/0963662506066719)
• Pidgeon, N. F., Lorenzoni, I. and Poortinga, W. 2008. Climate change or nuclear power - No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change 18(1), pp. 69-85. (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005)
• Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2008. Constructing responsibilities for risk: negotiating citizen-state relationships. Environment and Planning A 40(6), pp. 1312-1330. (10.1068/a39150)
• Haynes, K., Barclay, J. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2008. Whose reality counts? Factors affecting the perception of volcanic risk. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 172(3-4), pp. 259-272. (10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.012)
• Henwood, K.et al. 2008. Risk, framing and everyday life: Epistemological and methodological reflections from three socio-cultural projects. Health Risk and Society 10(5), pp. 421-438. (10.1080/13698570802381451)
• Poortinga, W., Cox, P. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2008. The perceived health risks of indoor radon gas and overhead powerlines: A comparative multilevel approach. Risk Analysis 28(1), pp. 235-248. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01015.x)
• Rogers-Hayden, T. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2008. Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: 'upstream' towards sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(8-9), pp. 1010-1013. (10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.013)
• Henwood, K. L., Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2008. Science, technology and risk perception: from gender differences to the effects made by gender. Equal Opportunities International 27(8), pp. 662-676. (10.1108/02610150810916730)
• Pidgeon, N. F.et al. 2008. The ethics of socio-cultural risk research. Health, Risk & Society 10(4), pp. 321-329. (10.1080/13698570802334526)
• Spence, A. A., Pidgeon, N. F. and Uzzell, D. 2008. Climate change - psychology's contribution. The Psychologist 22(2), pp. 108-111.
• Haynes, K., Barclay, J. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2008. The issue of trust and its influence on risk communication during a volcanic crisis. Bulletin of Volcanology 70(5), pp. 605-621. (10.1007/s00445-007-0156-z)
• Lorenzoni, I., O'Riordan, T. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2008. Hot air and cold feet: the UK response to climate change. In: Compston, H. and Bailey, I. eds. Turning down the heat: the politics of climate policy in affluent democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 104-124.

2007

• Horlick-Jones, T. E.et al. 2007. The GM debate: risk, politics and public engagement. Genetics and Society. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
• Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W. and Walls, J. 2007. Scepticism, reliance and risk managing institutions: towards a conceptual model of 'critical trust'. In: Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C. and Gutscher, H. eds. Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind. The Earthscan Risk in Society Series London: Earthscan, pp. 117-142.
• Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2007. Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnology in Britain: the case of GM food. In: Brossard, D., Shanahan, J. and Nesbitt, C. eds. The Public, the Media and Agricultural Biotechnology. Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing, pp. 21-56.
• Pidgeon, N. F. and Rogers-Hayden, T. 2007. Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or 'upstream engagement'?. Health, Risk & Society 9(2), pp. 191-210. (10.1080/13698570701306906)
• Rogers-Hayden, T. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2007. Moving engagement "upstream"? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science 16(3), pp. 345-364. (10.1177/0963662506076141)
• Haynes, K., Barclay, J. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2007. Volcanic hazard communication using maps: an evaluation of their effectiveness. Bulletin of Volcanology 70(2), pp. 123-138. (10.1007/s00445-007-0124-7)

2006

• Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2006. Exploring the structure of attitudes toward genetically modified food. Risk Analysis 26(6), pp. 1707-1719. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00828.x)
• Horlick-Jones, T. E.et al. 2006. On evaluating the GM Nation? Public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain. New Genetics and Society 25(3), pp. 265-288. (10.1080/14636770601032858)
• Clayton, H., Pidgeon, N. F. and Whitby, M. 2006. Is a cross-party consensus on climate change possible – or desirable? Report of first inquiry 2006. Technical Report.
• Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2006. Prior attitudes, salient value similarity, and dimensionality: Toward an integrative model of trust in risk regulation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36(7), pp. 1674-1700. (10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00076.x)
• Lorenzoni, I.et al. 2006. Cross-national comparisons of image associations with "global warming" and "climate change" among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research 9(3), pp. 265-281. (10.1080/13669870600613658)
• Rowe, G., Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2006. A comparison of responses to Internet and postal surveys in a public engagement context. Science Communication 27(3), pp. 352-375. (10.1177/1075547005284668)
• Pidgeon, N. F. and Poortinga, W. 2006. British public attitudes to agricultural biotechnology and the 2003 GM nation? Public debate: distrust, ambivalence and risk. In: Glasner, P., Atkinson, P. and Greenslade, H. eds. New Genetics, New Social Formations. Genetics and Society New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 10-36.
• Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2006. Situating local experience of risk: Peripherality, marginality and place identity in the UK foot and mouth disease crisis. Geoforum 37(5), pp. 844-858. (10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.11.004)
• Weyman, A. K.et al. 2006. Exploring Comparative Ratings and Constituent Facets of Public Trust in Risk Regulatory Bodies and Related Stakeholder Groups. Journal of Risk Research 9(6), pp. 605-622. (10.1080/13669870600799812)
• Lorenzoni, I. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2006. Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives. Climatic Change 77(1-2), pp. 73-95. (10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z)
• Jeffcott, S.et al. 2006. Risk, Trust, and Safety Culture in U.K. Train Operating Companies. Risk Analysis 26(5), pp. 1105-1121. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00819.x)
• Rogers-Hayden, T. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2006. Reflecting upon the UK's Citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law & Business (NLB) 3(2), pp. 167-178.
• Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. F. and Lorenzoni, I. 2006. Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted during october and november 2005. Technical Report.

2005

• Pidgeon, N. F.et al. 2005. Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision-making: the case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate. Risk Analysis 25(2), pp. 467-479. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00603.x)
• Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2005. Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?. Risk Analysis 25(1), pp. 199-209. (10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x)
• Rowe, G.et al. 2005. Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops. Public Understanding of Science 14(4), pp. 331-352. (10.1177/0963662505056611)
• Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N. F. and O'Connor, R. E. 2005. Dangerous Climate Change: The Role for Risk Research. Risk Analysis 25(6), pp. 1387-1398. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00686.x)

2004

• Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2004. Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs. Risk Analysis 24(6), pp. 1475-1486. (10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00543.x)
• Poortinga, W.et al. 2004. The British 2001 Foot and Mouth crisis: a comparative study of public risk perceptions, trust and beliefs about government policy in two communities. Journal of Risk Research 7(1), pp. 73-90. (10.1080/1366987042000151205)
• Wilkinson, S. B. T.et al. 2004. Exploring consumer attitudes towards functional foods: A qualitative study. Journal of Nutraceuticals, Functional & Medical Foods 4(3-4), pp. 5-28.
• Walls, J.et al. 2004. Critical trust: understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation. Health, Risk and Society 6(2), pp. 133-150. (10.1080/1369857042000219788)
• Niewöhner, J.et al. 2004. Evaluating the Efficacy of a Mental Models Approach for Improving Occupational Chemical Risk Protection. Risk Analysis 24(2), pp. 349-361. (10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00437.x)

2003

• Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2003. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis 23(5), pp. 961-972. (10.1111/1539-6924.00373)
• Cox, P.et al. 2003. The use of mental models in chemical risk protection: developing a generic workplace methodology. Risk Analysis 23(2), pp. 311-324. (10.1111/1539-6924.00311)
• Henwood, K. L. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2003. Grounded theory in psychological research. In: Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E. and Yardley, L. eds. Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design. Washington, DC: APA Publications, pp. 131-155.

2002

• Chilton, S.et al. 2002. Public perceptions of risk and preference-based values of safety. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 25(3), pp. 211-232. (10.1023/A:1020962104810)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 2002. Science, uncertainty and society. Eurohealth 8(1), pp. 16-18.

2001

• Henwood, K. L. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2001. Talk about woods and trees: threat of urbanization, stability, and biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(2), pp. 125-147. (10.1006/jevp.2000.0196)

2000

• Okrent, D. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2000. Introduction: Dilemmas in Intergenerational versus Intragenerational Equity and Risk Policy [Editorial]. Risk Analysis 20(6), pp. 759-762. (10.1111/0272-4332.206069)
• Pidgeon, N. F. and O'Leary, M. 2000. Man-made disasters: why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Safety Science 34(1-3), pp. 15-30. (10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00004-7)

1999

• Pidgeon, N. F., Henwood, K. L. and Horlick-Jones, T. E. 1999. Risk communication: new challenges for European health policy. Eurohealth 5(2), pp. 12-14.
• Pidgeon, N. F. 1999. Social amplification of risk: models, mechanisms and tools for policy. Risk, Decision and Policy 4(2), pp. 145-159.
• Carthy, T.et al. 1999. On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 2 - The CV/SG "Chained" Approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17(3), pp. 187-214. (10.1023/A:1007782800868)

1998

• Beattie, J.et al. 1998. On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 1-caveat investigator. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17(1), pp. 5-26. (10.1023/A:1007711416843)
• Fisk, J. E. and Pidgeon, N. F. 1998. Conditional probabilities, potential surprise, and the conjunction fallacy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 51(3), pp. 655-681. (10.1080/713755770)
• Okrent, D. and Pidgeon, N. F. 1998. Editorial: Risk perception versus risk analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59(1), pp. 1-4. (10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00345-1)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 1998. Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59(1), pp. 5-15. (10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 1998. Safety culture: key theoretical issues. Work and Stress 12(3), pp. 202-216. (10.1080/02678379808256862)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 1998. Shaking the kaleidoscope of disasters research - a reply. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 6(2), pp. 97-101. (10.1111/1468-5973.00078)

1997

• Fisk, J. E. and Pidgeon, N. F. 1997. The conjunction fallacy: the case for the existence of competing heuristic strategies. British Journal of Psychology 88(1), pp. 1-27. (10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02617.x)
• Pidgeon, N. F. 1997. The limits to safety? Culture, politics, learning and man-made disasters. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 5(1), pp. 1-14. (10.1111/1468-5973.00032)

1996

• Fisk, J. E. and Pidgeon, N. F. 1996. Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low component model in a contingent approach. Acta Psychologica 94(1), pp. 1-20. (10.1016/0001-6918(95)00048-8)

1995

• Henwood, K. L. and Pidgeon, N. F. 1995. Remaking the link: qualitative research and feminist standpoint theory. Feminism and Psychology 5(1), pp. 7-30. (10.1177/0959353595051003)
• Henwood, K. L. and Pidgeon, N. F. 1995. Grounded theory and psychological research. The Psychologist 8(3), pp. 115-118.