|
CASE STUDY:
Viikki Eco Neighbourhood Blocks
This case study is also
available in pdf format.
SECTOR: Holistic COUNTRY:Finland
BACKGROUND
In December 1998, the Government
approved a programme of ecologically sustainable development for the construction
and property sector, which focuses partly on arriving at models of good
practice. In 1998-2000, a special subsidy for pilot projects in line with
the principle of sustainability was linked with the Government experimental
building programme. During the period 1998 to 2002, an experimental area
of ecological building of international importance is being constructed
at Viikki, a district to the Northeast of the centre of Helsinki.
 Viikki
is situated 7 kilometres from the heart of Helsinki. Buses began running between
Viikki and the city centre in autumn 1999. In the future the area will also be
served by the new orbital 'Jokeri' line, running across the Helsinki Metropolitan
area. By 2010, Viikki residential district will be completed with Science Park
as its hub. The Science Park is an international centre of excellence growing
up around part of the University of Helsinki situated in Viikki which specialises
in biology and biotechnology. Viikki will then provide 6 000 jobs, places for
6 000 students and homes for 13 000 people.

Illustration 2. A house with solar heating.
EVALUATION
The Viikki eco neighbourhood blocks are the result of long-term work
aimed at putting ecological principles into practice in actual building.
Two design competitions were organised for the area and a number of seminars
and debates. The master plan competition was won by a proposal based on
a finger-like structure with alternating buildings and green open spaces.
The layout permits functions to be combined naturally, nutrients and water
to be recycled (composting, allotments, collecting surface water run-off),
and the utilisation of solar energy. Another competition was organised
for the first blocks. The proposals were evaluated using eco-criteria
drawn up by an interdisciplinary working group. The eco-criteria define
levels of five different aspects: pollution, natural resources, health,
bio-diversity and growing food. An environment profile was calculated
for each competition proposal. In this system, points for those five aspects
are added up. A zero-points scheme fulfils the strictest minimum criteria
for conventional residential building. A ten-point design represents an
ecologically excellent scheme and to exceed twenty points requires exceptional
innovation.

Source: http://www.hel.fi/ksv/english/projects/vikki_kivikko/latokartano/#
Here is an example of an environmental
profile for a proposed block. This block gets 4.3 points from reducing
pollution, 2.8 points from efficient use of resources, 2.3 points from
healthiness, 1 point from sustaining biodiversity and 1.4 points from
possibilities to grow food. 11.8 eco-points together tell that the block
is an ecologically excellent scheme, but doesn't have any exceptional
innovations. The best blocks in the area exceeded some 21 points. In this
comparison the maximum possible number of points is 34.

BENCHMARK DATA
Plenty of data is available based on detailed evaluation of the plans
and construction. In the Viikki projects, carbon dioxide emissions will
be cut at least by 20% in relation to conventional building and consumption
of pure water by more than 20%. Building site waste during construction
is 10% less than normal and, when the buildings are in use, the amount
of mixed refuse (max. 160 kg/person/year) is aimed to be 20% less than
normal. The use of non-renewable fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions
are prevented by cutting energy consumption. A good 60% of normal heating
energy is used (105 kWh/m2/year) and 45 kWh/m2/year of electricity. Consumption
of primary energy (energy bound up to materials) also has been reduced
by one fifth that of conventional building.

Illustration 5. Example data on Viikki schemes and conventional
building.
DRIVERS The
Viikki project can be regarded as a response to the Rio Climate Change Conference
an Kioto Agreement. The domestic driver is the Government's programme of ecologically
sustainable development including aims for cutting energy use. LESSONS
LEARNT The area is still under construction. All the lessons are not to
be seen yet. The only clear lesson yet is that much can be done. More data will
be collected and reported, when the area is totally constructed. The way of organising
this kind of holistic project, environmental evaluation of the schemes and many
technical innovations in construction might be the main topics of learning. The
main suspects against the ecologically favourable results are: is the area too
far from the existing services and will the car use followed from this 'eat' the
benefits of good house and area construction by high level of traffic energy use
and pollution. Studies will be made on the topic when possible. APPLICATION Most
of the information can probably be utilised in other countries. A special follow-up
or monitoring project has already been established, so the results will be reported
systematically. The solar heating project included in Viikki schemes is also approved
for the EU Thermie Programme. See 'Lessons learnt' above.

TRANSFERABILITY
See 'Application' above.
IMPACT
ON SUSTAINABILITY AREAS Environmental - High Social - Medium Economical
- High Institutional - Medium PROJECT
CONTACT Project director Heikki Rinne, Helsinki City heikki.rinne@kkansl.hel.fi
Project manager (land
use planning) Riitta Jalkanen, Helsinki City riitta.jalkanen@ksv.hel.fi Architect
Pirjo Pekkarinen-Kanerva, The Finnish Association of Architects/Eco Community
Project pirjo.pekkarinen@safa.fi Editor
in Chief Kari Ojala, Kuntatekniikka magazine, the author of this paper ojalaka@dlc.fi
REFERENCES - Towards
a Sustainable City. The Viikki Eco Neighbourhood Blocks 2000. The Finnish Association
of Architects, Eco Community Project 2000. Contact: Pekkarinen-Kanerva (above).
- Ecological building
criteria for Viikki. Helsinki City planning Publications 1998:6. Contact: Jalkanen
(above).
- Viikki.A Science
Park at the Centre of a New University District. City of Helsinki, City Planning
Department 1999. Contact: Jalkanen (above).
|