Skip to main content

Public procurement post-Brexit

Implying procurement - a mini shopping trolley placed on a laptop

What does public procurement in the UK look like post-Brexit?

Dr Anthony Flynn, Senior Lecturer in Supply Chain Management, delves into the UK’s new Procurement Bill, highlighting the similarities and differences to the pre-Brexit era…

UK’s new Procurement Bill

As of October 2023, the UK’s new Procurement Bill has passed through both Houses of Parliament and is currently in its final amendments stage. The Procurement Bill [1,2] ushers in a new era for public procurement post-Brexit.

There has been plenty of debate over how public procurement should be managed since European Commission (EC) Procurement Directives, as transposed into UK law, ceased to apply in January 2021. While some commentators envisaged a drastically new regime, the Procurement Bill indicates that changes to the status quo will be minor rather than major, and many of its signature policies bear a resemblance to what the EC is already doing.

Contracts

In a legal sense, the Procurement Bill consolidates the four sets of EC regulations that previously governed public contracts, utility contracts, concessions contracts, and defence contracts in the UK into a single regulatory framework. This is designed to streamline the purchasing process, reduce complexity, and minimise the administrative burden on buyers and suppliers.

The Bill sets out new rules for selecting suppliers, awarding contracts and post-contract management, including publishing information on supplier performance.

Public buyers will be able to tailor procurement to their specific requirements and have greater latitude over how they do business with suppliers – something known as the competitive flexible procedure.

Value for Money (VfM) is a priority

Value for Money (VfM) is to remain the overriding priority for public procurement in the UK post-Brexit. Progress has been made by the Conservative government in achieving VfM over the last ten years, especially through the rollout of national framework agreements that exploit purchasing economies of scale and reduce administrative costs.

The Procurement Bill aims to build on this progress, emphasizing the importance of financial savings through professional purchasing practices, process efficiencies, and innovative means of fostering competition, for example, expanding the use of dynamic purchasing systems.

Social value contract awards

Alongside VfM, the Bill refers to maximizing public benefit through procurement. This includes new ways to assess social value in contract awards, tying the award of major contracts to suppliers having carbon reduction plans and paying sub-contractors promptly, and reserving below-threshold contracts for SMEs and social enterprises. The latter aspect is interesting as it breaks with the EC principle of non-discrimination in supplier selection and moves the UK closer to the US model of reserving certain types of public contracts for SMEs and other designated firms.

Tensions and trade-offs existed between VfM and maximizing public benefit in the previous regime, however, it is unlikely that these will disappear with the Procurement Bill.

New digital platform

To make procurement more accessible and business-friendly, the Bill proposes the creation of a single digital platform for searching and applying for contract opportunities online. A ‘tell us once’ rule will apply whereby suppliers can use their registered details every time they tender and not have to re-submit the same information to different public sector customers. A ‘noticing regime’ that informs suppliers about public authorities’ future procurement intentions will also be introduced.

While welcome, these steps are not exactly new. The UK already has digital platforms for public contracts, for example, Contracts Finder and Sell2Wales. Under the previous EC regime suppliers were able to use the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which is akin to the ‘tell us once’ rule. Suppliers were also able to find out about the future procurement intentions of public authorities through Prior Information Notices (PINs), which are published on national and EC digital platforms.

Supplier probity

The Procurement Bill takes an assertive stance on supplier probity. It allows for the exclusion of suppliers whose performance is sub-par or who are guilty of misconduct. Offending suppliers can be placed on an exclusion list for up to five years. Government Ministers were able to exclude poor performers and ethically compromised firms in the past, but the Bill formalizes this power.

It also allows for firms to be debarred from UK public contracting on national security grounds or if complicit in human rights abuses. In response to the debacle over the award of personal protective equipment (PPE) contracts during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bill establishes a new competition process for emergency procurements.

Public Procurement Common Framework

While the Bill applies to contracting authorities in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, the Scottish Government has decided to maintain its own legal framework on procurement based on EC-derived law. To accommodate policy divergence across the four nations, the Public Procurement Common Framework is in place to enable the UK internal market to function, ensuring the UK can enter into new trade agreements and comply with its existing international obligations on free trade.

The Procurement Bill does not change the UK’s commitments under the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). Suppliers from other GPA signatories’, including the EU, the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, must be treated the same as domestic suppliers for above-threshold contracts (defense and clinical healthcare procurement are excepted).

The UK is also bound by its Trade & Cooperation Agreement (TCA) with the EU, which stipulates equal treatment for EU suppliers based in the UK for above-threshold and below-threshold government contracts. These are reciprocal agreements and UK suppliers will enjoy corresponding access to public procurement markets across the EU and in GPA signatory countries.

Comparisons to procurement pre-Brexit

With public procurement spending in the UK now in the region of £300 bn per annum, questions surrounding its objectives, priorities, and management are consequential. The overall thrust of the Procurement Bill suggests that procurement post-Brexit is going to look a lot like procurement pre-Brexit.

VfM is paramount while policies on climate change, social value, fair treatment of sub-contractors, and SME growth have been dusted down and re-packaged. This represents a continuation of the direction of travel in UK public procurement over the last decade, where VfM was pursued even as the Social Value Act 2012 was implemented, and a series of SME-friendly measures were rolled out.

There will still be a foreign supplier presence in the UK public procurement market, reflecting obligations of international free trade agreements and the UK’s own commitment to an open, market-based economy.

Suppliers from EU Member States will be able to freely compete for above-threshold contracts and EU suppliers with operations in the UK will be eligible to compete for any contract. As such, the public procurement landscape should not be markedly different from the pre-Brexit era.

What is different is that the UK now makes its own rules over how public contracts are advertised, awarded, and managed, which will hopefully translate into a less bureaucratic and more transparent system that benefits contracting authorities, domestic industry, and, ultimately, UK taxpayers and citizens.

References

  • 1. Jozepa, I (2023). Procurement Bill 2022-23. Research briefing number 9402. House of Commons Library. 05 January 2023, London.
  • 2. Gov.uk (2022). The Procurement Bill – a summary guide to the provisions. 16 June 2022, London.
Picture of Anthony Flynn

Dr Anthony Flynn

Senior Lecturer in Purchasing and Supply Management

Telephone
+44 29208 75890
Email
FlynnA2@cardiff.ac.uk