|
During the past few decades the use of qualitative research methods
has become increasingly widespread throughout the social sciences.
As the range and variety of these methods has expanded we have also
seen a proliferation of methodological literature, vigorously marketed
by commercial publishers, and dominated by Anglo-American authors and
their intellectual traditions.
These trends suggest that qualitative research is flourishing within
the social sciences and may appear to need little further support.
However, there is good evidence to suggest that while qualitative research
is highly visible, it exists within many sub-specialisms, and reflects
national as well as disciplinary boundaries. There is a clear need
for scholars throughout Europe to share, develop and promote high-level
methodological expertise. There is an equally pressing need for capacity
building within the European social sciences. Moreover, there are particularly
good reasons why a distinctively European perspective is needed.
Despite the widespread use of qualitative research in the social sciences,
there is an urgent need for capacity-building throughout the social
science disciplines. There is evidence to suggest that a good deal
of ‘qualitative’ research is methodologically limited. Leading researchers
repeatedly report difficulty in recruiting research associates and
research fellows who have sufficiently well-developed skills to carry
out funded research. This remains a problem even when – as in the United
Kingdom – there are well-established requirements and programmes for
postgraduate research training. The need for capacity-building is by
no means restricted to the promotion of skills at relatively junior
levels. There is an equally pressing need to improve the quality of
skills, the range of training competences, and technical expertise
at more senior levels.
The methodological literature on qualitative research in the social
sciences is globally, dominated by commercial publications from UK
and American publishing houses, and English-language academic journals.
The proliferation of such literature has promoted qualitative research
but it has tended to overlook and marginalize the actual and potential
contributions from other national and intellectual disciplines, especially
from key European states outside the UK. There are important, but mutually
isolated, traditions that relate to qualitative research that ought
to be brought together. They can and should inform and enhance the
existing research literature and the collective skills of European
social scientists. Synergy between European perspectives and Anglophone
traditions would enhance research capacity throughout the research
networks, most notably the European Research Area (ERA).
A distinctively European programme is required in order to link the
pockets of expertise to be found throughout the European states and
European disciplines in the social sciences. The current North American/Anglophone
domination of the research and methodological literature means that
important insights and strategies of research are being under-utilised,
to the detriment of the overall scientific effort. Furthermore, there
are major methodological innovations in this general area that need
to be shared across the national and regional research communities.
|